Splatter Metal

Is it more or less long lens on a spotting scope better?

I plan to purchase a large telescope (100 mm or more). I look at the different scopes of Meade and Celestron. It seems that for a given diameter lens, the Meade seems to have a longer focal length. The Both companies offer interchangeable telescope eyepieces type offering different magnification. I'm actually trying to solve a .3 "(30 caliber) hole 1.000 and 0.22, a splash of white on metal balls (on paper or hole) to 250 meters. Thinking about one of Schmitt-125mm Cassigrain extended which doubles as a low-power telescope. So, more or less focal allow better resolution? And how much magnification do, given equal objectives in diameter?

The main drawback to using a long-range focus to identify the limited field of view. with a range of 125 mm f/10, your maximum field of view (assuming a 1.25 "Focuser) is about 1.3 °, and the lowest power is about 40x. Might work OK for target identification, but it is far from optimal for wildlife. magnification is limited by the opening (Figure 50x per inch, or 2x per mm at best) and atmospheric conditions. There are often more theoretical magnification shows that the shimmering heat so more detail.

---

---